Evaluation of coronal microleakage in teeth with intraorifice barriers at 2mm and 3mm: An in vitro study
Abstract
Context:
An intraorifice barrier after endodontic therapy could remarkably mitigate the movement of bacteria and their by-products and improve the long-term prognosis of a root canal treated teeth by serving as barriers against fluid and bacterial ingress.
Aims:
The idea of the present study was to compare the coronal microleakage in teeth with 2-mm and 3mm intraorifice barriers of Bulkfill flowable composite, Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC), Cention and Biodentin under a stereomicroscope.
Methods and Material:
Eighty freshly extracted human single rooted mandibular premolars with single canal were chosen for the study. Teeth were obturated with gutta-percha using AH plus sealer. The teeth were further divided into 5 groups (16 premolars each) on the basis of intraorifice barrier material used: Bulkfill composite, GIC, Cention, Biodentin and control group. These groups were further subdivided into 2 subgroups each of 2mm and 3mm (8 teeth each) and evaluated under stereomicroscope
Statistical analysis used:
Coronal microleakage was determined under stereomicroscope using 15X magnification. Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA
Results:
According to the results, GlC at 2mm exhibited the highest micro leakage and least microleakage was shown by Biodentin at 3mm.
Conclusions:
Intraorifice barriers play a key role in reducing coronal microleakage.
Keywords:
Biodentine, Bulkfill composite, Cention, Coronal microleakage, Glass Ionomer Cement, intraorifice barrier
References
2. Wolanek GA, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Volkmann KR. In vitro bacterial penetration of endodontically treated teeth coronally sealed with a dentin bonding agent. Journal of Endodontics. 2001 May 1;27(5):354-7.
3. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. International Endodontic Journal. 1995 Jan;28(1):12-8.
4. Priyalakshmi.S, Manish Ranjan. Review on Biodentine-A Bioactive Dentin Substitute. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2014;13(1):13-17.
5. Malik G, Bogra P, Singh S, Samra RK. Comparative evaluation of intracanal sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and glass ionomer cement: An in vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry: JCD. 2013 Nov;16(6):540-5.
6. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. American Journal of Dentistry. 2000 Nov;13:25D-30D.
7. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. International Endodontic Journal. 2008 Dec;41(12):1026-46.
8. Magura ME, Kafrawy AH, Brown CE, Newton CW. Human saliva coronal microleakage in obturated root canals: an in vitro study. Journal of Endodontics. 1991 Jul 1;17(7):324-31.
9. Bhullar KK, Malhotra S. Comparative evaluation of intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2019;11(1):14-9.
10. Peters O, Öhring TN, Lutz F. Effect of eugenol‐containing sealer on marginal adaptation of dentine‐bonded resin fillings. International Endodontic Journal. 2000 Jan;33(1):53-9.
11. Jafari F, Jafari S. Importance and methodologies of endodontic microleakage studies: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017 Jun;9(6): e812.
12. Torabinejad M, Anderson P, Bader J, Brown LJ, Chen LH, Goodacre CJ, Kattadiyil MT, Kutsenko D, Lozada J, Patel R, Petersen F. Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replacement: a systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007 Oct 1;98(4):285-311.
13. Magura ME, Kafrawy AH, Brown CE, Newton CW. Human saliva coronal microleakage in obturated root canals: an in vitro study. Journal of Endodontics. 1991 Jul 1;17(7):324-31.
14. Zaia AA, Nakagawa R, De IQ, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Souza- Filho FJ. An in vitro evaluation of four materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth. International Endodontic Journal. 2002 Sep;35(9):729-34.
15. Sauáia TS, Gomes BP, Pinheiro ET, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, Souza-Filho FJ. Microleakage evaluation of intraorifice sealing materials in endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2006 Aug 1;102(2):242-6.
16. Bhullar KK, Malhotra S. Comparative evaluation of intraorifice sealing ability of different materials in endodontically treated teeth: An in vitro study. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ 2019;11(1):14-9.
17. Malkondu Ö, Kazandağ MK, Kazazoğlu E. A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. BioMed research International. 2014;2014, 160951:1-11.
18. Koubi S, Elmerini H, Koubi G, Tassery H, Camps J. Quantitative evaluation by glucose diffusion of microleakage in aged calcium silicate-based open-sandwich restorations. International Journal of Dentistry. 2012; Vol 2012, 105863,1-6.
19. Benetti AR, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honoré D, Pedersen MK, Pallesen U. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Operative dentistry. 2015 Mar;40(2):190-200.