Free Fibula Flap in Mandibular Reconstruction : A Case Report
Abstract
The reconstruction of the mandible is a complex procedure and continues to be a challenge in reconstructive maxillofacial surgery. Indications for mandibular reconstruction are varied and include pathological resections, traumatic injuries and residual deformities amongst others. The mandible is an important anatomical unit of maxillofacial skeleton in terms of both aesthetics and function which necessitates its immediate reconstruction after resection.
A 16 years old female patient, diagnosed with ameloblastoma of left hemi -mandible underwent resection with immediate reconstruction using free fibula flap. Twenty two months follow up reveals excellent bony union and facial contours. The objective of the treatment is to resecting the mandibular defects and reconstruction with free fibular flap.
Our experience combined with positive literature references enhances the reliability of free fibular vascularized graft as a suitable and versatile reconstructive option for complex anatomical contours of the mandible.
References
2. Selvamani M YA, Basandi SP, Madhushankari GS. Analysis of prevalence and clinical features of multicystic ameloblastoma and its histological subtypes in South Indian sample population: A retrospective study over 13 years. J Pharm Bioallied Sci., 2014; 6(1): 131–34.
3. Santos TS PM, Andrade ESS, Vajgel A, Vasconcelos RJH, Martins, Filho PRS. Ameloblastoma in the Northeast region of Brazil: A review of 112 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, 2014; 18(1): 66-71.
4. Barnes L EJ, Reichart P, Sidransky D. Pathology and genetics of head and neck tumours: WHO classification of tumours series. Lyon: IARC Press, 2005; 296300.
5. El-Mofty SK GN, Farish SE, Rodu B. Peripheral ameloblastoma: A clinical and histologic study of 11 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1991; 49: 970-74.
6. Guerrisi M PM, Keszler A. Odontogenic tumours in children and adolescents: A 15-year retrospective study in Argentina. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2007; 12: 180-85.
7. Ledesma-Montes C M-TA, Carlos-Bregni R, de León ER, Palma-Guzmán JM, Páez-Valencia C, et al. Ameloblastomas: A regional Latin-American multicentric study. Oral Diseases, 2007; 13: 303-07.
8. Kim SG JH. Ameloblastoma: A clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic analysis of 71 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2001; 91: 64953
9. Urken ML. Weinberg H, Vickery C. Oromandibular reconstruction using microvascular composite free flaps. Arch. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991; 117: 733-44
10. Genden E, Haughey BH: Mandibular reconstruction by vascularized free tissue transfer. Am J Otolaryngol. 1996; 17: 219- 27.
11. Ritvik P. Mehta and Daniel G. Deschler. Mandibular reconstruction in 2004: an analysis of different techniques. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 2004; 12: 288-293
12. Hidalgo“Fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap for reconstruction of composite mandibular defects,” PlastReconstr Surg ,1994;93:305.
13. Kroll SS, Schusterman MA, Reece GP, et al: Choice of flap and incidence of free flap success,Plast Reconstr Surg,1996; 98:459.
14. Foster R, Anthony J, Sharma A, et al: Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: an outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success, Head Neck,1999;21:66.
15. Pogrel MA, Podlesh S,Anthony J,et al: A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects, J Oral Maxillofac Surg ,1997; 55:1200.
