Parents perceptions and support for e-learning of Dental undergraduate students during Covid-19 lockdown

  • Dr. Sreenivasa Bharath, T
  • Dr. Vineeth Guduri
  • Dr. Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti Vishnu Dental College
  • DR. Ramakrishna Alla
  • Dr. Rajesh N
  • Dr. Sudhakarareddy R
Keywords: COVID-lockdown, Digital Learning, E-learning perception, Microsoft teams, Parents perceptions


Objectives: The study's objective was to implement effective education strategies and to record parents' perceptions of e-learning based on their children's advantages and challenges in attaining knowledge during the lockdown.

Methods: A total of 363 parents of students participated in the study. Based on the academic year of their children, 363 parents of dental students were categorized into four groups as parents of I BDS (93), II BDS (89), III BDS (93), and IV BDS (88). After introducing the e-learning system to all the students, the effectiveness of e-learning tools was evaluated by feedback forms. Demographics and background information, online teaching and learning methods, benefits and challenges, technical support by the faculty were assessed from the parents through Google forms to know whether their wards benefited through online teaching.

Results: 85.9% of parents said that their wards were well engaged due to the online education system. 80.2 % of parents were satisfied with the institution's overall online education pattern. On a scale of 0 to 5, 33.9% of parents rated excellent for the faculty and management's efforts during online classes. 86.2 % of parents believed that their wards were benefited due to the online education system.

Conclusion: The new system of e-learning managed to share the material, conducted assignments, and discussed exceptional cases of dental specialties to retain knowledge among the dental students during this lockdown. All the parents were happy enough that their wards had benefited absolutely from the online education system.


1. E-learning methodologies - A guide for designing and developing e-learning courses.
2. Niall T. Stevens, Killian Holmes, Rachel J. Grainger, Roisín Connolly, Anna-Rose Prior, Fidelma Fitzpatrick, Eoghan O’Neill1, Fiona Boland, Teresa Pawlikowska and Hilary Humphreys. Can e-learning improve the performance of undergraduate medical students in Clinical Microbiology examinations?. BMC Medical Education 2019;19:408.
3. Al-Shorbaji, N., Atun, R., Car, J., Majeed, A., & Wheeler, E.E- Learning for undergraduate health professional education. A systematic review informing a radical transformation of health workforce development. World Health Organisation. 2015.
4. Frehywot, S., Vovides, Y., Talib, Z., Mikhail, N., Ross, H., Wohltjen, H., et al. E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries.BMC Human Resources for Health 2013; 11(4).
5. Nicoll, P., MacRury, S., Van Woerden, H. C., & Smyth, K. Evaluation of technology-enhanced learning programs for health care professionals: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2018; 20(4), 1–9.
6. Goel V. Facebook leads an effort to lower barriers to internet access. New York Times; 2013 ( r=0, accessed 3 October 2019).
7. WikiProject Medicine. Wikipedia; 2013 (https://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine, accessed 10 September 2019).
8. Littlejohn A. Developing countries and the MOOC learning revolution. Conversat. 2013 (http://theconversation. com/developing-countries-and-the-mooc-learningrevolution-19355, accessed 10 September 2019).
9. "The 32 Most Innovative Online Educational Tools to Use in 2015". Noodle. Mar 15, 2015.
10. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, Morton SC, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144(10): 742–52.
11. Ng Y, Peggy LP. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) prevention: virtual classroom education for hand hygiene. Nurse Educ Pract 2020;45:102782.
12. Sandra Barteit, Dorota Guzek, Albrecht Jahn, Till B€arnighausen, Margarida Mendes Jorge , Florian Neuhann. Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Computers & Education 145 (2020) 103726.
13. Community needs assessment - SlideShare.
14. The future of learning and teaching: Big changes ahead for.
15. Asefeh Badiey Houshyari, Mahnaz Bahadorani1, Mina Tootoonchi1, John Jacob Zucker Gardiner2, Roberto A. Peña3, Peyman Adibi. Medical Education and Information andCommunication Technology. Journal of Education and Health Promotion | Vol. 1 | March 2012.
16. Sife A, Lwoga E, Sanga C. New technologies for teaching and learning: challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. Int J Educ Dev using ICT. 2007;3(2):57–67.
17. Mirza, A. A. & Al-Abdulkareem, M. Models of e-learning adopted in the Middle East. Applied Computing and Informatics journal 2011; 9( 2): 83-93.
18. Coronato & Antonio. (2010). Pervasive and Smart Technologies for Healthcare: Ubiquitous Methodologies and Tools: Ubiquitous Methodologies and Tools. IGI Global.
19. World Health Organization. Making the most of existing health workers. In: World Health Report. World Health Organization; 2013.
20. Kai Ruggeri, Conor Farrington, and Carol Brayne. A Global Model for Effective Use and Evaluation of e-learning in health. Telemedicine and e-HealthVol. 19, No. 4.
How to Cite
T, D. S. B., Guduri, D. V., Pasupuleti, D. M. K., Alla, D. R., N, D. R., & R, D. S. (2021). Parents perceptions and support for e-learning of Dental undergraduate students during Covid-19 lockdown. UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 7(3).