Efficacy of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 0.1% octenidine dihydrochloride mouth rinses in patients with plaque induced gingivitis: Double blinded randomised case control study.

  • Mohammed Ahsan Razi Hazaribag College Of Dental Sciences And Hospital
  • Annapurna Ahuja MDS, Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology, Hazaribag College of Dental Sciences & Hospital, Hazaribag, 825301 Jharkhand, India.
  • Seema Qamar Postgraduate Student, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Hazaribag College of dental Sciences and Hospital, Demotand, Hazaribag 825301, Jharkhand, India.
  • Ankit Mahajan MDS, Department of Periodontology, Government Dental College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • Pooja Mittal MDS, Senior lecturer, Department of Periodontology, Desh Bhagat dental college & Hospital, Mandi, Punjab, India
Keywords: Gingivitis, Plaque, Mouth rinse, Efficacy, Octenidine, Chlorhexidine.

Abstract

Aims: The study aims at making a comparative study of two commercially available mouth rinses, 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 0.1% octenidine dihydrochloride for assessing their efficacy as an antiplaque agent in patient with plaque induced gingivitis.

Methods and Material:

In double-blinded experimental study forty-five patients with dental plaque induced gingivitis, divided into 3 groups of 15 patients each, were advised 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and 0.1% octenidine dihydrochloride (OCT) and distilled water as a mouth rinses respectively. Clinical parameters viz, Plaque Index, Modified Gingival Index and Gingival Bleeding Index were assessed (day 0, 5,10 and15). Microbial count was also assessed from the collected plaque samples (at day 0 and on day 15). Antimicrobial susceptibility test was also done.

Statistical analysis used: One- way ANOVA with post hoc test using Tukey, Paired- t test, Mann-Whitney U test, The Kruskal-Wallis test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test

Results:

There was significant difference in mean plaque index between the different groups. There was a significant reduction in plaque index for 0.2% CHX The mean modified gingival index was higher in group belonging to 0.1% OCT compared to 0.2% CHX that was statistically significant (p = 0.005).  Similarly, the mean gingival bleeding index was significantly higher in group belonging to 0.1% OCT compared to 0.2% CHX (p = 0.005). On day 15 change in the microbial count was statistically significant for 0.2% CHX (p = 0.026).and 0.1% OCT (p = 0.001).

Conclusions:

The antimicrobial and antiplaque efficacy (in vivo and in vitro) of 0.1% octenidine dihydrochloride containing mouth rinse was comparatively higher than that containing 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate thereby demonstrating the former's potential usefulness in controlling plaque and gingivitis.

References

1. Loe H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol 1965;36:177–87.
2. Madianos PN, Bobetsis YA, Kinane DF. Generation of inflammatory stimuli: how bacteria set up inflammatory responses in the gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:57-71.
3. Lindhe J, Axelsson P, Tollskog G. Effect of proper oral hygiene on gingivitis and dental caries in Swedish schoolchildren. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1975;3,150–55.
4. Patel RM, Malaki Z. The effect of a mouthrinse containing essential oils on dental plaque and gingivitis. Evidence Based Dentistry 2008;9:18−9.
5. Moritis K, Jenkins W, Hefti A, Schmitt P, McGrady M. A randomized, parallel design study to evaluate the effects of a Sonicare and a manual toothbrush on plaque and gingivitis. Journal of Clinical Dentistry 2008;19:64−8.
6. Kalaga A, Addy M, Hunter B. The use of 0.2% chlorhexidine as an adjunct to oral health in physically and mentally handicapped adults. J Periodontol 1989;60:381–5.
7. Lakade LS, Shah P, Shirol D. Comparison of antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine and combination mouth rinse in reducing the Mu-tans streptococcus count in plaque. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32:91-6.
8. O'Connor JR, Paris DA, Bailey DM. Octenidine hydrochloride, an effective dental plaque inhibitor. Journal of Dental Research 1980;59A:743.
9. Slee AM, O'Connor JR. In vitro antiplaque activity of octenidine hydrochloride (WIN 41464-2) for preformed plaques of selected plaque-forming microorganisms. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983;23:379-84.
10. Emilson CG, Bowen WH, Robrish SA, Kemp CW. Effect of the antimicrobial agent octenidme on the plaque flora in primates. Journal of Dental Research 1980;59A:489.
11. Patters MR, Anerud K, Trummei CL, Kornman KS, Nalbandian J, Robertson PB. Inhibition of plaque formation in humans by octenidine mouth rinse. Journal of Periodonta! Research 1983;18:212-9.
12. Decker EM, Weiger R, Wiech I, Heide PE, Brecx M. Comparison of antiadhesive and antibacterial effects of antiseptics on Streptococcus sanguinis. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:144-8.
13. Prasad SD; Goda PC & Reddy KS & Kumar SR & Hemadri M, Reddy DSR. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of neem and Aloe vera leaf extracts in comparison with 3% sodium hypochlorite and 2% chlorhexidine against E. faecalis and C. albicans. Journal of Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences. 2016;5:104-10.
14. Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Karring T. Oral hygiene, gingivitis and periodontal breakdown in adult Tanzanians. Journal of Periodontal Research 1986;21:221–32.
15. Baelum V, Wen-Min L, Fejerskov O, Xia C. Tooth mortality and periodontal condition in 60- to 80-year-old Chinese. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1988;96:99–107.
16. Lindhe J, Axelsson P, Tollskog G. Effect of proper oral hygiene on gingivitis and dental caries in Swedish schoolchildren. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1975;3:150–5.
17. Payne WA, Page RC, Ogilvie AL, Hall WB. Histopathologic features of the initial and early stages of experimental gingivitis in man. Journal of Periodontal Research 1975;10:51–64.
18. Page RC, Schroeder HE. Pathogenesis of inflammatory periodontal disease. A summary of current work. Laboratory Investigation 1976;34:235–49.
19. Moore WE, Holdeman LV, Smibert RM, Hash DE, Burmeister JA, Ranney RR. Bacteriology of severe periodontitis in young adult humans. Infection and Immunity 1982;38:1137–48.
20. Gjermo P, Rolla G, Arskaug L. Effect on dental plaque formation and some in vitro properties of 12 bis-biguanides. J Periodontal Res 1973;12:81-92.
21. Addy M. Chlorhexidine compared with other locally delivered antimicrobials. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:957-64.
22. Varoni E, Tarce M, Lodi G, Carrassi A. Chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry: state of the art. Minerva Stomatol 2012;61:399-419.
23. Lang NP, Brecx M. Chlorhexidine digluconate. An agent for chemical plaque control and prevention of gingival inflammation. J Periodontal Res 1986;21:74–89.
24. Eriksen HM, Nordbo H, Kantanen H, Ellingsen JE. Chemical plaque control and extrinsic tooth discoloration. A review of possible mechanisms. J Clin Periodontol 1985;12:345-50.
25. D Osso, N Kanani. Antiseptic mouth rinses: an update on comparative effectiveness, risks and recommendations. J Dent Hyg 2013;87:10-8.
26. Hepso HU, Bjornland T, Skoglund LA. Side-effects and patient acceptance of 0.2% versus 0.1% chlorhexidine used as post-operative prophylactic mouthwash. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17:17-20.
27. Okano M, Nomura M, Hata S, et al. Anaphylactic symptoms due to chlorhexidine gluconate. Arch Dermatol 1989;125:50-2.
28. Bergqvist-Karlsson A. Delayed and immediate-type hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine. Contact Dermatitis 1988;18:84-8.
29. Cheung J, O'Leary JJ. Allergic reactions to chlorhexidine in an anesthetized patient. Anaesth Intensive Care 1985;13:429-30.
30. Patters M.R, Nalbandian J, Nichols FC, Niekrash CE, Kennedy J.E, Kiel RA, Trummel CL. Effects of Octenidine Mouthrinse on Plaque Formation and Gingivitis in Humans, J Periodont Res 1986;21:154-62.
31. Dogan AA, Adiloglu AK, Onal S, Cetin ES, Polat E, Uskun E, et al. Short term relative antibacterial effect of octenidine dihydrochloride on the oral microflora in orthodontically treated patients. Int J Infect Dis 2008;12:19-25.
32. Robrish SA, Emilson CG, Kemp CW, Eberlein D, Bowen WH. A comparison of viable counts and adenine nucleotide analysis to determine the effect of antimicrobial agent on dental plaque. Curr Microbiol 1981;5:343-7.
33. Welk A, Zahedani M, Beyer C, Kramer A, Müller G. Antibacterial and antiplaque efficacy of a commercially available octenidine-containing mouthrinse. Clinical Oral Investigations 2015;20:1469–76.
34. Beiswanger BB, Mallatt ME, Mau MS, Jackson RD, Hennon DK. The clinical effects of a mouthrinse containing 0.1 % octenidine. J Dent Res 1990;69:454–57.
35. Schmidt J, Zyba V, Jung K, Rinke S, Haak R, Mausberg RF, et al. Cytotoxic effects of octenidine mouth rinse on human fibroblasts and epithelial cells - an in vitro study. Drug Chem Toxicol 2016;39:322–30.
Published
2021-03-13
How to Cite
Razi, M. A., Annapurna Ahuja, Seema Qamar, Ankit Mahajan, & Pooja Mittal. (2021). Efficacy of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 0.1% octenidine dihydrochloride mouth rinses in patients with plaque induced gingivitis: Double blinded randomised case control study. UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 7(1). Retrieved from https://ujds.in/index.php/ujds/article/view/414

Most read articles by the same author(s)