Diagnostic Imaging and Techniques in Implant Dentistry: A Review

Diagnostic Imaging and Techniques in Implant Dentistry: A Review

  • BRIJ KUMAR RUNGTA COLLEGE OF DENTAL SCIENCES AND RESEARCH
  • Premkishore K Professor & HOD
  • LUMBINI PATHIVADA
  • ANIL PANDEY
Keywords: Dental Implant, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Lateral Cephalometrics

Abstract

The ultimate goal of dental implant therapy is to satisfy patient’s desire to replace one/ more missing teeth in an esthetic, secure, functional and long lasting manner. Techniques of imaging and their accurate interpretation in implant dentistry are a very important and crucial step for successful treatment. Various types of radiographic images are used for diagnosis and treatment planning of dental implant patients. Options ranges from standerd projections eg. Intraoral (periapical, occlusal), extraoral (panoramic, lateral cephalometric) radiographs, routinely available in the dental office to more complex radiographic techniques eg. Conventional x-ray tomography(CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), typically available only in radiographic centers. This article discusses an advanced imaging procedures for implant with their advantages and disadvantages when compared with conventional imaging techniques.

Author Biographies

Premkishore K, Professor & HOD

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Research, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India

LUMBINI PATHIVADA

Reader, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Research, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India

ANIL PANDEY

Assistant Professor, Government Dental College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

References

1. Jayadevappa BS, Kodhandarama GS, Santosh SV, Rashid WT. Imaging of dental implants. J Oral Health Res 2010;1:50-61.

2. Frederiksen NL. Diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;80:540-54.

3. Nagarajan A, Perumalsamy R, Thyagarajan R, Namasivayam A. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant therapy. J Clin Imaging Sci 2014;4:4

4. Michael J. Engelman et al. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet dent 1988:59:4:467-473.

5. Harold P. Truitt et al. Non invasive technique for mandibular subperiosteal implant. A preliminary report. J Prosthet Dent. 1986:44:494-7.

6. Ramuald J. Fernadez et al. A cephalometric tomographic technique to visualize the buccolingual and vertical dimensions of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1987:58:466-470

7. Devg C. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with dental implants. A clinical report. IJOMI 1997: 12:3:354-359

8. Lam E.W Reprecht and Yang. Comparison of two dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent 1995:74:42-46.

9. AW Lawrence. CT scan as a radiologic data base for optimum implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent 1993: 69: 381-385

10. Almog, Rodolfo Sanchez. Correlation between planned prosthetic andresidual bone trajectories in dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999: 81:5: 562.

11. Modica, et al. Radiologic prosthetic planning of the surgical phase of the treatment of edentulism by osseointegrated implants. An invitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1991:65:541-546

12.Along D. Fabrication of imaging and surgical guides for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2001:85:504-508.

13. Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging.) J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jun;89(6):611-5.

14. Siu AS, Li TK, Chu FC, Comfort MB, Chow TW. The use of lipiodol in spiral tomography for dental implant imaging. Implant Dent. 2003;12(1):35-40.

15. Basten CH. The use of radiopaque templates for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int. 1995 Sep;26(9):609-12

16. Aryatawong S, Aryatawong K. Evaluation of the inferior alveolar canal by cross-sectional hypocycloidal tomography. Implant Dent. 2000;9(4):339-45.

17. Tan KB. The use of multiplanar reformatted computerised tomography in the surgical-prosthodontic planning of implant placement.) Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1995 Jan;24(1):68-75.

18.Siddiqui AA, Caudill R, Beatty K. Use of an optical comparator for radiographic measurement of bone loss around endosseous implants: a pilot study. Implant Dent. 1995 Summer;4(2):85-8.

19. Ludlow JB, Nason RH Jr, Hutchens LH Jr, Moriarty J. Radiographic evaluation
of alveolar crest obscured by dental implants. Implant Dent. 1995 Spring;4(1):13-8.

20. Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW. Pre-surgical dental implant assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Implantol. 1996;22(2):147-53.

21.Takeshita F, Suetsugu T. Accurate presurgical determination for implant placement by using computerized tomography scan. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Dec;76(6):590-1.

22. Cehreli MC, Aslan Y, Sahin S. Bilaminar dual-purpose stent for placement of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Jul;84(1):55-8.
Published
2024-10-08
How to Cite
BRIJ KUMAR, Premkishore K, LUMBINI PATHIVADA, & ANIL PANDEY. (2024). Diagnostic Imaging and Techniques in Implant Dentistry: A Review . UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.21276/ujds.2024.10.3.22