Truss Access Cavity Design: Limitations and Management: A Case Report

  • Rashmi Bansal

Abstract

Missed root canal is the major cause of failure in the endodontic treatment. Recently,
conservative access cavity designs are advocated to conserve tooth structure specially
pericervical dentin. Although several researchers have shown them to have better mechanical
and biological features, the technique has its own limitations. This case report discusses the
limitation in success of Truss Access Cavity Design and their management. Magnification and 3-
D imaging is effective in resolving the limitations and should be considered treatment of choice
when Truss cavity is used as an access cavity design.
This case report describes a clinical case of chronic irreversible pulpits in left mandibular first
molar undergoing root canal treatment with emphasis on a new conservative approach employed
in the access opening.
A 32-year-old male patient suffered severe sensitivity of the left lower first molar with attrition
involving enamel and dentin as well as pulp with the mesio-occlusal proximal restoration.
Endodontic treatment was performed with Truss Design a new conservative approach on access
opening of lower molar but there was a missed canal as analyzed on Dentascan later and re-
treated for locating the missed canal. Though Truss technique preserved most of the healthy

References

1. Ballester B, Giraud T, Ahmed HMA, Nabhan MS, Bukiet F, Guivarc’h M. “Current
strategies for conservative endodontic access cavity preparation techniques-systematic
review, meta-analysis, and decision-making protocol”. Clin Oral Investig 25.11
[2021]:6027-6044. Doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04080-7. Epub 2021 Oct 8. PMID:
34623506.
2. Patil P, Newase P, Pawar S, Gosai H, Shah D, Parhad SM. “Comparison of fracture
resistance of endodontically treated teeth with traditional endodontic access cavity,
conservative endodontic access cavity and Ninja endodontic access cavity designs: An in
vitro study”. Cureus 14.8 [2022]:e28090
3. Chan MYC, Cheung V, Lee AHC, Zhang C. “A literature review of minimally invasive
endodontic access cavities- past, present and future”. Eur Endod J 7.1 [2022]:1-10
4. Neelakantan P, Khan K, Hei GP, Yup CY, Zhang CF, Cheung GSP. “Does the orifice
directed dentin conservation access design debride pulp chamber and mesial root canal
systems of mandibular molars similar to a traditional access design?” J of Endod 44.2
[2018] :274-279.
5. Kishan KV, Savaliya K, Shroff M, Saklecha P. “Comparative evaluation of the effect of
conventional and truss access cavities on remaining dentin thickness, canal
transportation, and canal centering ability in mandibular molars using cone-beam
computed tomography”. Endodontology 35.2 [2023]:137-141

6. Mookhtiar H, Hegde V, Srilatha S, Chopra M. “Conservative endodontics: A truss access
case series”. Int J Appl Dent Sci 5.4 [2019]:213-218.
Published
2025-04-11
How to Cite
Rashmi Bansal. (2025). Truss Access Cavity Design: Limitations and Management: A Case Report. UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.21276/ujds.2025.11.1.15